Compliance and in October It

The Discrepancies That Arose Within Nato After Actions in the Serbian War in Support of Kosovo's Decision to Unilaterally Declare Itself an Independent Country Continued After the Attacks of September , in New York. George Bush Claimed the Right to Carry Out Preventive War Actions to Defend His Security on a Global Scale. The White House Asked Nato Partner Countries for Help and Demanded the Application of Article of Mutual Defense of the Treaty. This Article Obliges, in the Event of an Attack on a Coalition Member State, to Support and Participate Militarily in Defense of the Attacked Country. Finally , the United States.

Would Not Demand Its Began Its Attacks in Afghanistan Unilaterally, at the Head of a Coalition in Which the Rest of the Countries Played a Secondary Role of Political Cover for Its War Actions. Why Didn't the Us Demand the UK Mobile Database Application of Article of Nato ? Basically, Because It Did Not Trust Its European Allies and Reserved for Nato a Subsidiary Role in the Occupation Operation Enduring Freedom, as Was Seen Shortly Afterwards, in January , When Nato Assumed Command of the International Assistance Force for Security ( Isaf , for Its Acronym in English). This Operation, Authorized by the Security Council.





With the Mission of Helping to Rebuild Afghanistan's Devastated Infrastructure, Actually Served to Cover the Rear of Us Combat Forces, in Addition to Covering Up the Illegal Occupation of Afghan Territory. And It Was an Illegal Occupation Because Un Resolution , Approved One Day After the September Attacks, Only Established That the United States Had the Right to Defend Itself, Without Mentioning Afghanistan as Responsible for the Terrorist Attacks. A Similar Situation Occurred in the Iraq War. The United States Did Not Have Nato Due to the Disagreement Between Various Member Countries, Such as France, Germany and Belgium. They Firmly Opposed the Invasion and Prevented the Security Council From Ruling in Favor of These Operations.